New Civil Engineer Civil engineering and construction news and jobs from New Civil Engineer
An effective case for expanding Gatwick before Heathrow could be made if the role of airports changes, a leading aviation expert has told New Civil Engineer's Engineers Collective podcast.
There is a strong economic case for allowing Gatwick to build a second runway before Heathrow builds its third under a future model where airports become “transport providers”, Cranfield University senior lecturer in airport planning and management Henrik Rothe has claimed.
Rothe leads the Urban Turbine, a design-led research project pursuing airports' responses to societal changes. He made the claim during his guest appearance on the second episode of New Civil Engineer's podcast, The Engineers Collective.
He said: “In the long-term airports need to reconsider their position within the transport industry. If they become transport providers for people who are flying into a city to take them to the place they want to be, then we are talking about a different model that is probably 20 years ahead.
“The challenge we have right now is that there is a terrible amount of infrastructure around Heathrow which disallows us from thinking Heathrow can be left out of further infrastructure development.
“But if there is an opportunity to check-in at Heathrow and fly out from Gatwick that would be a very smart movement. It would disperse noise and emissions from aircraft without taking business away from Heathrow.
London mayor Sadiq Khan has also already expressed support for expanding Gatwick instead of Heathrow on the grounds that it could boost the UK economy without causing air pollution problems. He says it would be cheaper and quicker to expand Gatwick.
Earlier this year, three other politicians leading the charge against the proposed third runway at Heathrow also called for alternative airport expansions.
Speaking to New Civil Engineer outside the High Court in London, shadow chancellor John McDonnell, Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith and Liberal Democrat Baroness Kramer called for alternatives to airport expansions at Heathrow.
McDonnell and Goldsmith favour expanding regional airports and Gatwick. Kramer wants Birmingham airport to be expanded.
Episode 2 of the Engineers Collective also explores ongoing debate about the case for building High Speed 2, debates the decision to cancel the £1.4bn bypass of the M4 around Newport, and presses the case for more investment in Northern Powerhouse rail and challenges the three-year closure of London's historic Hammersmith Bridge.
- Keep up to date with all the industry news and views, via The Engineers Collective monthly podcast.
Like what you've read? To receive New Civil Engineer's daily and weekly newsletters click here.
It is blindingly obvious that the addition of a second runway at Gatwick adds far more capacity than that provided by a third runway at Heathrow. It is about time that aviation experts told government this fundamental truth. The two 2-runway airports within about 30 miles of each other could be linked by a High speed (ie 150mph) railway and be operated as a coordinated single airport. Journey time could be 20 minutes which is quicker than the time it takes to travel between individual terminals at Heathrow!
It is stupid to keep forcing more and more intensive development at Heathrow when the supporting infrastructure is already massively overloaded and getting to and from it with a 3rd runway will only get more difficult whatever “improvements” are made.
And how can they possibly reduce the air pollution at Heathrow by ADDING another runway?
The only reason that the case for Heathrow is being pushed so strongly is because of the competition between it and Gatwick. If they were both owned by the same owner (now there’s a novel concept) they would be promoting another runway at Gatwick without a doubt.