https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/national-highways-spent-352000-removing-infill-from-great-musgrave-bridge-09-02-2024/ Civil engineering and construction news and jobs from New Civil Engineer Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:51:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0 https://www.newcivilengineer.com/wp-content/themes/mbm-mops-2017/images/logo.gif https://www.newcivilengineer.com 125 75 Civil engineering and construction news and jobs from New Civil Engineer https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/national-highways-spent-352000-removing-infill-from-great-musgrave-bridge-09-02-2024/#comment-4661 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:51:18 +0000 https://www.newcivilengineer.com/?p=274118#comment-4661 It is difficult to justify National Highways’ policy. It is also hard not to conclude that they seem to be making a real “meal” of the remedial work in order to be as awkward as they can. I would far rather they just said: “We made a misjudgement and we will try harder next time to come to the right decision”.

]]> https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/national-highways-spent-352000-removing-infill-from-great-musgrave-bridge-09-02-2024/#comment-4659 Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:41:22 +0000 https://www.newcivilengineer.com/?p=274118#comment-4659 Following this and other similar debacles, perhaps ICE shall investigate those members who were National Highways decision makers for potential breaches of the Code of Professional Conduct?

]]> https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/national-highways-spent-352000-removing-infill-from-great-musgrave-bridge-09-02-2024/#comment-4654 Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:30:28 +0000 https://www.newcivilengineer.com/?p=274118#comment-4654 National Highways, not fit for purpose. Lacking in communication skills, planning skills and common sense I’m afraid

]]>